Perfect.
Should be a list with core packages/modules and with specific modules.
Of course, first should be defined the "core modules" and the "specific modules".
Agree.
Agree.
I'm not programmer but I'm sure you're right.
IMO, if you don't have good and stable core modules, that mean a good and stable NS, all specific modules are for nothing. Maybe just to be listed.
The developers should be attracted for specific modules or for fix and/or improve core modules? Which is the priority for NS?
Again, I'm totally agree with Nas: